Pay Me Now, Pay Me Later – Eliminating
Fire-Fighting in Business
One of the
biggest causes of frustration for business owners is constant “fire-fighting.” Things go wrong unexpectedly and much effort
is required to take care of the issues. These
problems suck up cash, resources, and time and business owners have to delay
positive efforts, limiting growth and reducing customer satisfaction. To these owners, it seems that when one fire
is put out, another one rises. This cycle seems endless.
I have found that in most
cases, prevention of the problems takes a bit of foresight and planning upfront
that will eliminate chaos and tons of wasted effort solving the problems. Warning:
The “fix” is not new ideas or technology! The fix just is not used as often as it
should be.
As an example, recently, I
was asked to help Michelangelo’s Flood and Fire Repair, a $5.1 million restoration
company who ran into a cash shortage situation.
The first place I always look when cash is tight is Accounts Receivable
– who owes money for completed work. In
the case with Michelangelo’s Construction, very few customers were late paying
and the amount overdue was not appreciable. Working back from their there, the
owner and I looked at jobs in progress. We
saw that multiple projects were expected to close within the next two weeks and
would result in about $837,000 in revenue.
At $5.1 million in revenue, the revenue run-rate for Michelangelo Flood
and Fire repair should be close to $100,000 per week. The $837,000 that could be collected in the
next two weeks should be about eight weeks of revenue, which means that
Michelangelo’s Flood and Fire Repair projects had fallen about six weeks
behind.
To understand why the company
project portfolio was six weeks behind required digging into each project to
find out where things were taking longer than plan. In the case of Michelangelo’s, projects
involved an insurance company and some, but not all, of the issues that caused
projects to fall behind involved paperwork requirements of the insurance
industry.
1.
Custom ordered materials (doors, windows,
cabinets, countertops, carpet) were late or had to be returned and reordered
because they were damaged or not correct.
Issues with late materials typically results in multiple phone calls and
trips to the supplier, and often, an upset customer.
2.
Cannot connect with the customer to obtain a
signature on the insurance form to denote that the project has been completed
satisfactorily. The result is making
multiple phone calls and sometimes multiple visits to the customer.
3.
Insurance company has not completed the final
review of the paperwork prior to releasing a check to the customer. Multiple phone calls need to be made to find out
when the review will be complete.
4. The
insurance check requires multiple signatures – a bank, other parties who co-own
the property, etc. Often, the customer
is placed in charge of this, meaning extra effort for them.
As it turns out, these
four areas of concern are common to many project and fall late in the project
timing. A slip in any of them, in almost
all cases, directly impacts the completion of the project and collection of
payment. However, for all of them, a
little additional effort up front can minimize or prevent issues at the end. For instance:
Custom
Ordered Material
1.
When ordering custom material, spending an extra
hour with the supplier to understand his design processes and implementing
checks and approvals at critical steps to make sure the design drawings are
accurate minimizes chance of receiving incorrect material. Setting up dates when these checkpoints
should occur helps to stay on top of the situation.
2. Reviewing
shipping and packing procedures of the supplier to make sure damage won’t occur
helps to minimize the change of damage during shipment.
Customer Signature
1.
Setting up an initial walk-through procedure
with the customer helps to identify any issues prior to completion of the
project.
2.
Remedying identified issues and conducting a
final walk-through with the customer to verify everything is correct ensures
customer satisfaction.
3. At
the final walk-through, obtaining the customer signature on the insurance form
provides an ending to the project.
Insurance Company
Review
1.
Obtaining a promise date from the reviewer sets
expectations.
2.
At that time, ask the reviewer if it’s OK to
call to verify the review has been completed keeps everyone on the same
timeline.
3. Additionally,
asking the review what you should do to obtain confirmation if, when you call,
the reviewer does not answer the phone drives agreement to a next step if
required.
Multiple Signatures
Required
1.
Verifying at time of service start the parties
who have to sign the check allows for scheduling necessary activities.
2.
For multiple owners, explaining the process and
negotiating an agreement on how best to get everyone’s signature sets
expectations.
3. If
a bank is involved, identifying the bank employee responsible for review and
signature, and what the person needs to see to sign sets expectations. Negotiating with that bank employee how best
to deliver the material needed and gain the signature puts everyone on the same
timeline.
Implementing these preventative
activities into the standard work flow has greatly improved project (and cash)
flow and reduced project effort required.
Notice that in every case, a little forethought with just a small bit of
effort upfront – planning ahead – can prevent weeks of delays and extra effort,
and increases customer satisfaction in the end.
I have found that this philosophy works well in almost any business
spending significant time and effort on fire-fighting. Is this revolutionary thought? No.
But given the frequency of companies in a continual fire fight,
implementation of the process is rare. Common
sense? Apparently not so common.